Sex and Gender Womens Health Collaborative
  • HOME
  • Sex Matters
    • Historical Perspective
    • Research Policies
    • New Betting Sites Uk 2025
    • Non Gamstop Casinos Uk
    • Online Casinos
    • Non Gamstop Casinos
  • Resources
    • SGBM Practitioner Registry
    • Curriculum/Training
    • Teaching Tools
    • Presentations
    • Reports/Guidelines
    • Journal Articles
    • Newsletters
    • Recommended Links
  • Professional Education
    • SGBM Practitioner Registry
    • Case Studies
    • Online Courses
    • Medical Meetings
    • Recommended Books
    • Webinars
  • Blog
  • Participate
    • Founding Partners
    • Collaborators
    • Women’s Health Affiliations
    • Support
  • About
    • Vision and Mission
    • Bylaws
    • Programs & Projects
    • Sex & Gender News
    • BOARD OF DIRECTORS
    • Peer Review Policy
    • Disclaimer
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Blog
  • “Female Viagra” -Reasons to be Skeptical

Search

Tags

Autoimmune brain Cancer Cardiology Cardiovascular disease clinical care clinical research Cognition cognitive function CVD Depression diabetes diet Emergency Medicine Endocrinology FDA Genetics health care heart disease hypertension inflammatory diseases IOM medical devices medical education medication Mental Health Musculoskeletal Neurology NIH Nutrition Obesity Oncology Osteoporosis pain Pharmacology psychiatry Psychology psychosocial research research reporting Sleep stroke SWHR Women's Health Women's Health

“Female Viagra” -Reasons to be Skeptical

October 18, 2015 / SGWHC Editorial Staff / Blog
0
caution red

6 reasons to be skeptical of the new “Female Viagra”

There is much controversy over the August 18, 2015 FDA approval of a new drug, Filbanserin which purportedly will treat condition of “Female Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder, which was renamed “Female Sexual Interest/Arousal Disorder in 2013.  

An interesting article by Julia Bellez in Vox.com summarizes some of the concerning issues related to this drug’s approval.  As a result of this recent FDA approval, the drug, Addyi, will hit the market this October.  

Six reasons to be skeptical about flibanserin are: 

  1. Flibanserin has to be taken daily and takes, on average, 4 weeks of therapy before an effect is noted. And “peak” results don’t occur for 8 weeks.
  2. The effect was pretty minimal.  Women on the drug  experienced 4.4 “satisfying sexual experiences per month vs those on placebo, who experienced 3.7 satisfying experiences per month.  That is only about ½ of a sexual experience aided by the drug. 
  3. Women experienced fairly dangerous side effects if flibanserin was taken with alcohol – 17% incidence of low blood pressure and fainting, after only 2 glasses of wine.  However, as the National Women’s Health Network stated in their op-ed, of the 25 people in the alcohol side effect study, only 2 women were included!
  4. In fact, this side effect issue was such a liability, that the company requires that clinicians and pharmacists who prescribe flibanserin take a course about risks before being certified to prescribe it.  
  5. It was only approved for premenopausal women, when experience shows the problem to be at least as prevalent, if not more prevalent, in older women.
  6. The mechanism of action of the drug lies in the brain and central nervous system, in contrast to the drugs for erectile dysfunction in men.  In fact, flibanserin was originally studied in the area of antidepression therapy.  

In fact, the National Women’s Health Network and Georgetown University’s Pharmed Out organization have taken a very strong stance against the approval of this drug.

SGWHC applauds the thoughtful work of these advocacy organizations which have spoken out against the approval of a drug which appears to have a very minimal positive effect for Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder in women, and a fairly serious side effect profile.   

Pharmacology, libido, female viagra, sexual dysfunction

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • USPSTF Tells Congress that More Research is Needed on Women’s Health.
  • Gender Differences in Infectious Disease
  • “Female Viagra” -Reasons to be Skeptical
  • Long-Term Opioid Therapy Relieves Chronic Pain in Only 20% of Women
  • Women are missing in trials of drugs and vaccines for HIV

Recent Comments

  • binary options on Sex Differences in Sepsis
  • Give Thanks: Feeding Your Microbes and Feeding Your Lineage | Madhupa Maypop on Health Conditions Affect Women More
  • Jan Werbinski, MD, ED of SGWHC on Sex and Gender Based Medical Education Topics

Receive SGWHC Updates

Would you like to receive our newest articles as soon as they are posted? Just give us your email address in the sign-up box on our Home page.

See our Disclaimer to assure that we won't share your address.

Read Our Newsletter

Read our latest (and archived) Newsletters.

Contact Us

  • 269.207.3426
  • [email protected]
  • Contact Us
    • YouTube
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • Linkedin
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Blog
  • Medical Meetings
  • Resources
  • Newsletters
  • Disclaimer
(c) 2015 Sex and Gender Womens Health Collaborative
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS