Sex and Gender Womens Health Collaborative
  • HOME
  • Sex Matters
    • Historical Perspective
    • Research Policies
    • Non Gamstop Casinos Uk
    • Online Casinos
    • Non Gamstop Casinos
  • Resources
    • SGBM Practitioner Registry
    • Curriculum/Training
    • Teaching Tools
    • Presentations
    • Reports/Guidelines
    • Journal Articles
    • Newsletters
    • Recommended Links
  • Professional Education
    • SGBM Practitioner Registry
    • Case Studies
    • Online Courses
    • Medical Meetings
    • Recommended Books
    • Webinars
  • Blog
  • Participate
    • Founding Partners
    • Collaborators
    • Women’s Health Affiliations
    • Support
  • About
    • Vision and Mission
    • Bylaws
    • Programs & Projects
    • Sex & Gender News
    • BOARD OF DIRECTORS
    • Peer Review Policy
    • Disclaimer
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Evaluating Sex Differences in Medical Device Clinical Trials: Time for Action

Search

Tags

Autoimmune brain Cancer Cardiology Cardiovascular disease clinical care clinical research Cognition cognitive function CVD Depression diabetes diet Emergency Medicine Endocrinology FDA Genetics health care heart disease hypertension inflammatory diseases IOM medical devices medical education medication Mental Health Musculoskeletal Neurology NIH Nutrition Obesity Oncology Osteoporosis pain Pharmacology psychiatry Psychology psychosocial research research reporting Sleep stroke SWHR Women's Health Women's Health

Evaluating Sex Differences in Medical Device Clinical Trials: Time for Action

March 11, 2013 / SGWHC Editorial Team / Blog
0
01.22.MMOW.Rally.30apr00
 SS Dhruva, RF Redberg
 
The Safety and Effectiveness of Medical Treatments can differ in men and women formany reasons related to different epidemiologic characteristics, physiology, and body size. In general, women have higher bleeding rates and procedural morbidity and mortality than men, which means that their risk/benefit ratios for many implanted medical devices can differ from men. Therefore, sex-specific safety and effectiveness data are necessary for informed patient decision making. In 2008, the US Food andDrug Administration (FDA) convened 2 work- shops on this topic that included multiple stakeholders, patient groups, medical device industry representatives, academia, and government officials. In December 2011, the FDA released a draft guidance informed by these workshops, entitled “Evaluation of Sex Differences in Medical Device Clinical Studies.”1 This document discusses the underrepresentation of women in medicaldevice clinical trials and provides recommendations for increasing enrollment of womenand performing sex-specific analyses.
 
For Full Commentary, Go to:  JAMA, March 21, 2012

Clinical trials, medical devices

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Busting 5 Common Myths About FDA and Women’s Health
  • Sex and Gender in Acute Care Medicine
  • Gender Medicine: The Groundbreaking New Science of Gender- and Sex-Based Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Colorectal Cancer in Women
  • Sex Differences in Chronic Pain

Recent Comments

  • hoodiebuddies on Sex specific risks of heart disease and cognition
  • MartinGriffi on In This Case: Assessing the Altered Mental Status of an Elderly Patient
  • latina on Sex Differences in Sexually Transmitted Infections

Receive SGWHC Updates

Would you like to receive our newest articles as soon as they are posted? Just give us your email address in the sign-up box on our Home page.

See our Disclaimer to assure that we won't share your address.

Read Our Newsletter

Read our latest (and archived) Newsletters.

Contact Us

  • 269.207.3426
  • [email protected]
  • Contact Us
    • YouTube
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • Linkedin
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Blog
  • Medical Meetings
  • Resources
  • Newsletters
  • Disclaimer
(c) 2015 Sex and Gender Womens Health Collaborative
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS