Sex and Gender Womens Health Collaborative
  • HOME
  • Sex Matters
    • Historical Perspective
    • Research Policies
    • Non Gamstop Casinos Uk
    • Online Casinos
    • Non Gamstop Casinos
  • Resources
    • Curriculum/Training
    • Teaching Tools
    • Presentations
    • Reports/Guidelines
    • Journal Articles
  • Professional Education
    • Webinars
    • Case Studies
    • Online Courses
    • Medical Meetings
    • Recommended Books
  • Blog
  • Participate
    • FOUNDING PARTNERS
    • Collaborators
    • Women’s Health Affiliations
    • Recommended Links
    • Support
  • About
    • Vision and Mission
    • Programs & Projects
    • News
    • BOARD of DIRECTORS
    • Peer Review Policy
  • Contact Us
Home» Resources » Journal Articles » Assessing Sex Differences in Hip Replacement

Resources

  • Curriculum/Training
  • Teaching Tools
  • Presentations
  • Reports/Guidelines
  • Journal Articles

Assessing Sex Differences in Hip Replacement

Posted by SGWHC Editorial Team - February 19, 2013 - Journal Articles
0

Women Show Greater Rate of Failure after Total Hip Arthroplasty 

Maria C. S. Inacio, MS; Christopher F. Ake, PhD; Elizabeth W. Paxton, MA; Monti Khatod, MD; Cunlin Wang, MD, PhD; Thomas P. Gross, MD, MPH; Ronald G. Kaczmarek, MD, PhD; Danica Marinac-Dabic, MD, PhD; Art Sedrakyan, MD, PhD.   Published online February 18, 2013

Abstract

Importance  The role of sex in relationship to implant failure after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is important for patient management and device innovation.

Objective  To evaluate the association of sex with short-term risk of THA revision after adjusting for patient, implant, surgery, surgeon, and hospital confounders.

Design and Setting  A prospective cohort of patients enrolled in a total joint replacement registry from April 1, 2001, through December 31, 2010.

Participants  Patients undergoing primary, elective, unilateral THA.

Main Outcome Measures  Failure of THA, defined as revision procedure for (1) any reason, (2) septic reason, or (3) aseptic reason after the index procedure.

Results  A total of 35 140 THAs with 3.0 years of median follow-up were identified. Women constituted 57.5% of the study sample, and the mean (SD) patient age was 65.7 (11.6) years. A higher proportion of women received 28-mm femoral heads (28.2% vs 13.1%) and had metal on highly cross-linked polyethylene-bearing surfaces (60.6% vs 53.7%) than men. Men had a higher proportion of 36-mm or larger heads (55.4% vs 32.8%) and metal on metal-bearing surfaces (19.4% vs 9.6%). At 5-year follow-up, implant survival was 97.4% (95% CI, 97.2%-97.6%). Device survival for men (97.7%; 95% CI, 97.4%-98.0%) vs women (97.1%; 95% CI, 96.8%-97.4%) was significantly different (P = .01). After adjustments, the hazards ratios for women were 1.29 (95% CI, 1.11-1.51) for all-cause revision, 1.32 (95% CI, 1.10-1.58) for aseptic revision, and 1.17 (95% CI, 0.81-1.68) for septic revision.

Conclusions  After considering patient-, surgery-, surgeon-, volume-, and implant-specific risk factors, women had a 29% higher risk of implant failure than men after THA in this community-based sample.

Also See:    Commentary on Sex and Risk of Hip Implant Failure by Diana Zuckerman, PhD

For Full Articles:  JAMA Intern Med. 2013

Share this:

  • Print
  • Email
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
aging, medical devices, Musculoskeletal

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Recent Posts

  • Who Owns the Bones?
  • Reflections from Women in Medicine
  • Sex Influences from Space Flight
  • Quality of Life Differs Before Heart Attack Strikes
  • Gender, Sex, and Health Research

Recent Comments

  • Ami on Necessity of Gender Medicine
  • What About Men's Health | Sex and Gender Womens Health Collaborative on Men’s Health Neglected?
  • Gender Medicine is Real | Sex and Gender Womens Health Collaborative on Necessity of Gender Medicine
  • Scoliosis Affects Women More | Sex and Gender Womens Health Collaborative on Scoliosis Citations
  • jodi on Evaluating sex and gender competencies in the medical curriculum: a case study.

Contact Us

  • 973.746.8206
  • [email protected]
  • Contact Us
    • Youtube
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • Linkedin
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Blog
  • Medical Meetings
  • Resources
(c) 2012 Sex and Gender Women's Health Collaborative
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Rss
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.